Claimant scorecard · AERS v2.1 · Calibrating
European Commission
14 claims tracked in the Responsibility Ledger. 14 pending grades.
AERS
—
Insufficient closed grades
Pending
14
Open horizons
Closed
0
Graded outcomes
First tracked
Apr 24, 2026
Open horizons
European Commission: Proposed the EU Kids Act September 17, banning social media for under-13s and requiring parental supervision for 13-14-year-olds, with the same restrictions applying to AI chatbots
European Commission: Unveiled EU Kids Act setting age 15 for autonomous social media and AI chatbot access, barring under-13s entirely
European Commission: Will propose Thursday a regulation barring under-15s from accessing AI chatbots, social media, video-sharing platforms, and online games without parental control
European Commission: Will propose Thursday that under-15s be barred from AI chatbots, social media, and online games without parental control
European Commission: Designated ChatGPT as a Very Large Online Search Engine under the Digital Services Act on August 31, giving OpenAI until end of December 2026 to comply with risk assessments, independent audits, and algorithmic transparency requirements
European Commission: Designated ChatGPT as a Very Large Online Search Engine under the Digital Services Act on August 31, 2026, based on 159.1 million average monthly EU users, requiring OpenAI to comply with risk assessments, audits, and transparency rules by January 2027
European Commission: Began enforcing August 2, 2026, Article 50 transparency obligations under the AI Act, requiring providers and deployers of AI systems that generate or manipulate content to disclose AI involvement and embed machine-readable marks, with fines up to €15 million or 3% of global annual turnover for non-compliance
European Commission: Announced July 31, 2026, that Article 50 transparency obligations of the EU AI Act became enforceable August 2, requiring AI systems interacting with users to disclose they are AI, and requiring providers of generative AI to mark synthetic content, with noncompliance triggering fines of up to €15 million or 3% of worldwide annual turnover
European Commission: Article 50 transparency obligations of the EU AI Act became enforceable August 2, 2026, requiring providers of AI systems to disclose when users interact with AI, mark AI-generated content, and detect deepfakes, with penalties up to €15 million or 3% of worldwide annual turnover
European Commission: Digital Omnibus entered into force July 27, 2026, extending high-risk AI compliance deadlines to December 2027 while maintaining August 2, 2026 as the date transparency obligations take effect across the EU's 450-million-person single market
European Commission: Published July 20, 2026, final guidelines on Article 50 transparency obligations of the EU AI Act, requiring providers of interactive AI systems, generative AI systems, and emotion-recognition systems to disclose AI involvement and mark synthetic content starting August 2, 2026, with fines up to €15 million or 3% of worldwide turnover for non-compliance
European Commission: Published July 7, 2026, action plan committing to operational EU AI model evaluation capacity by 2027, with secure testing platform for critical sectors
European Commission: Published July 7, 2026, action plan committing to operational EU AI model evaluation capacity by 2027, with secure testing platform for critical sectors
European Commission: ChatGPT assessed for 'Very Large Online Search Engine' classification
Invalidator — By July 24, 2026, the European Commission has not published a formal designation of ChatGPT as a Very Large Online Search Engine or Very Large Online Platform, and either (a) the Commission publicly states the assessment concluded ChatGPT does not qualify, (b) OpenAI or Commission officials confirm the designation process was paused or abandoned, or (c) no public record of the designation exists and no explanation has been provided by EU authorities.
About this scorecard
The AI Execution Risk Score (AERS) is a 0-100 metric quantifying the gap between European Commission’s public AI claims and demonstrated delivery. Higher AERS = stronger track record. Each claim above is drawn from a primary source linked in the original Ledger entry; the horizon date is when the claim becomes graded under the published methodology. Materiality is the editor’s assessment of the claim’s formality from 1 (PR statement) to 5 (earnings call or SEC filing).
AERS v2.1 · Methodology in active calibration · Not investment advice.