Claimant scorecard · AERS v2.1 · Calibrating
FTC
5 claims tracked in the Responsibility Ledger. 5 pending grades.
AERS
—
Insufficient closed grades
Pending
5
Open horizons
Closed
0
Graded outcomes
First tracked
Jul 3, 2026
Open horizons
FTC: Issued civil investigative demands to OpenAI and Anthropic October 14 seeking documents on safety incidents, safeguards, marketing and privacy policies; each subpoena exceeds 50 pages
FTC: Opened broad investigation into OpenAI and Anthropic September 30 over AI safety and consumer protection, preparing civil investigative demands
FTC: Proposed July 1, 2026, policy statement asserting state AI laws requiring output alterations may constitute federal deception violations, with Colorado's AI Act cited as impliedly preempted
FTC: Issued July 1, 2026, proposed policy statement declaring AI companies that steer outputs toward undisclosed ideological objectives may violate Section 5 of the FTC Act through deceptive conduct
FTC: Published July 1, 2026, proposed policy statement declaring AI companies that steer outputs toward undisclosed ideological objectives may violate Section 5 of the FTC Act through deceptive conduct
About this scorecard
The AI Execution Risk Score (AERS) is a 0-100 metric quantifying the gap between FTC’s public AI claims and demonstrated delivery. Higher AERS = stronger track record. Each claim above is drawn from a primary source linked in the original Ledger entry; the horizon date is when the claim becomes graded under the published methodology. Materiality is the editor’s assessment of the claim’s formality from 1 (PR statement) to 5 (earnings call or SEC filing).
AERS v2.1 · Methodology in active calibration · Not investment advice.